Physics · A-Level
A-Level Physics tutors
A-Level Physics has the widest gap of any science between what students feel they understand and what they can score. The subject is conceptually satisfying and mercilessly precise in assessment, and closing that gap is mostly technique work.
Last reviewed 2026-09-21 · 3 cited sources
Structure and what it implies
Following the 2015 reforms, A-Level Physics is linear: all examinations are sat at the end of the second year, and AS-Level is a standalone qualification that no longer feeds into the A-Level grade. Grading runs A* to E, with U for unclassified.
Alongside the written papers sits the practical endorsement, reported separately as a pass or fail rather than contributing to the grade, while practical skills themselves are assessed within the written papers. Students often under-attend to the practical work because it does not carry grade weight directly, and then meet those same skills in the examination.
Specifications are set by the awarding bodies — AQA, OCR, Pearson Edexcel, WJEC/Eduqas and CCEA — under Ofqual regulation, and they differ enough that board-specific experience is worth asking about.
Where marks are lost
Definitions and precise statements of law account for a surprising number of marks, and they are answered approximately by students who understand the physics perfectly well. Mark schemes here are unforgiving in a way that rewards a few hours of deliberate practice.
Extended six-mark questions reward structured explanation — a logical chain in physics terms, not a description of what happens. Students who write everything they know score in the lowest band.
Practical and data-analysis questions are the third area: uncertainties, percentage errors, choosing what to plot to obtain a straight line, and extracting meaning from a gradient. These are learnable in isolation and are worth a substantial share of the paper.
Underneath all of it is mathematical fluency. Physics students taking mathematics alongside generally find the load manageable; those not taking it are doing two subjects at once and should say so when looking for a tutor.
- Definitions stated precisely, in the mark scheme's terms
- Six-markers structured as an argument, not a description
- Uncertainty and graph analysis practised deliberately
- Mathematical fluency treated as part of the subject
What to look for in a tutor
Board-specific experience first: ask which specification they have taught most recently and whether they have examined for it. Examiner experience is particularly valuable in physics, where the difference between a three-mark and a five-mark answer to the same question is a matter of mark-scheme convention.
Then ask how they would establish whether a student's difficulty is physical or mathematical. A tutor without a method for that will teach physics at a student whose actual obstacle is rearranging equations under time pressure.
Timing and cost
Because the subject is cumulative and linearly assessed, early support pays back further. Mechanics and the mathematical toolkit met in the first year underpin everything afterwards, so repairing them early is worth more per hour than the same help later.
The evidence on one-to-one tuition supports short, regular sessions over a defined period of up to ten weeks rather than an open-ended weekly hour. For physics, frequent short sessions working through past six-markers and data questions tend to outperform long content reviews.
Expect roughly €45 to €110 an hour, with examiner-experienced tutors at the top of that band. TutorDeluxe charges students nothing and takes no commission on lessons.
Verified physics tutors
Indicative range for this subject and level: €45–€110 per hour. Every tutor below passed our verification review before publication.
No physics tutor is published for this level yet.
Our directory is curated rather than comprehensive — a tutor appears only once identity, qualifications, experience and references have all been reviewed. Browse the full directory, or tell us what you need and we will let you know when a match is published.
Common questions
- Can you take A-Level Physics without A-Level Maths?
- It is permitted and it is harder. The mathematical demand is real, and students not taking mathematics are effectively learning that content inside physics lessons. Mention it when looking for a tutor — it changes what the tutoring needs to cover.
- Does the practical endorsement affect the grade?
- It is reported separately as a pass or fail rather than contributing to the A-Level grade, but practical skills are assessed within the written papers. Treating practical work as optional therefore costs marks in the examination itself.
- Why does my child understand physics but score badly?
- Usually definitions answered loosely and extended responses that describe rather than explain. Both are technique problems with a fast remedy — often the largest available improvement for a strong student who is underperforming.
Every tutor here has been reviewed.
We verify identity, qualifications, experience and references before a profile is published. Students and parents pay nothing, and we take no commission on lessons.
Read next
A-Level Mathematics tutors
A-Level Mathematics is now a linear qualification, and that single structural fact changes how tutoring should be used. There is…
IB Physics tutors
IB Physics punishes students who can recall physics but cannot deploy it under exam conditions, and it puts an unusually large…
A-Level Chemistry tutors
A-Level Chemistry is the subject where the gap between GCSE and A-Level is widest. Students arrive with strategies that worked —…
IB vs A-Level: how tutoring support differs
Parents often look for "a maths tutor" when what they need is "an IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches HL tutor" or "an Edexcel…
Sources
Every factual claim above traces to one of these. We link out so you can check us.
- 1.GCE Advanced Level (United Kingdom) — Wikipedia. Accessed 2026-09-21.
- 2.Ofqual — Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation — GOV.UK. Accessed 2026-09-21.
- 3.One to one tuition — Teaching and Learning Toolkit — Education Endowment Foundation. Accessed 2026-09-21.